History – Moyer Bell Books

Reality, is really how we perceive it? I’ve seen an inverted world Babylonian Talmud tract Pesajim what is the reality? There is something external? Or is it an image created within us depending on our internal attributes? It would seem obvious that the reality is everything that we see around us: houses, people, the whole universe that we can see, touch, hear, taste and smell. But is it really that? It is tomorrow. You open your eyes and you stretch. It’s a new day, the Sun is shining and the birds sing. But inside you, you feel that something is not good.

You woke up from the wrong side of the bed and the least you want to do is get up. However, remember that yesterday was a perfect day; you knew that it would be formidable from the moment that you woke up, and you was great the entire day. And today, not even want to get out of the bed. What was it that changed? Did you change the reality? O, changed you? According to Kabbalah, the image of the world we know is, in fact, non-existent. The world is a phenomenon which we perceive humans. It is the reflection of the degrees of equivalence between the attributes of the individual and the force which lies outside him, the force of nature, the attribute of absolute love and granting. In other words, the degrees of equivalence between the attributes of the human being and the nature is what man perceives as the world. What do they want us to say with this? Let’s hand of a radio receiver to do a demonstration. Radio stations are constantly transmitting, but we only hear them when we tune to the station at a certain frequency. How captures the receiver signal? It generates an internal frequency identical to the sound waves in the air.

The present reflection aims at to demonstrate as and great diverse the historical sources that the historian makes use to reconstruct the historical tram of the social individuals in the time and space. The Historian and it I dialogue with the past Somebody can ask: how historian establishes the contact, dialogues with the past? How to arrive ties there, if it does not exist more? How the knowledge of the possible past and? In view of that all knowledge of the past is ‘ ‘ indireto’ ‘ e, then, the historian, for definition, is in the impossibility of proper it to evidence the 2 facts that studies ‘ ‘. Thus, as it affirms Franois Simiand, the historical knowledge is ‘ ‘ a knowledge through 3 vestiges ‘ ‘ of perceivable marks to the left directions ‘ ‘ for a phenomenon in exactly impossible itself of captar’ ‘ 4 Ahead of this, remains to the historian to the task to try to reconstitute to possible existences for the people of the past and the contexts where they were dived, where they had acted producing its forms of experience that they had relegated to the gift. Thus, we have that to search in such a way to the human beings of the point of view of its time-space as the processes that produce the one facts inside determined period of time. Of this form, we can say that History becomes related with the Time 5. E, more specifically, it becomes related with the past seen from the gift. Or, still, it is the gift, looking for to give to a direction and an explanation for the past. ‘ ‘ footprint humana’ ‘ throughout the times, inside of the historical process, it is, at the same time, process of production of the culture and a crystallization necessity that if carries through for the register..