Tag: law and order

Land Ownership

Michael

When carrying out activities related to the registration of land ownership in the problem at first appear simple, but includes some pitfalls. This is a land border agreement with your neighbors on site. Maybe long enough to be friendly with the neighbors, but when there is a problem related to the harmonization of the actions of the borders, for example, who owns a certain number of square meters of land or small pond, which is jointly constructed, there is a conflict of vested interests. Itself the task of harmonizing land borders with its neighbors is simple, in the Cadastral Chamber need to take inventory statement B-1 at sites Your neighbors, it is usually offered to do the cadastral engineers, at a time when you are applying it to land-deed. But the form of HF-1 gives the data, usually only one of a number of previous owners of the site, as before, by legislation during the registration of land rights information on the new owner of the House would not surrender. Then you will write a statement that your neighbors have to fill in the name of the document on the right to area, passport information the site owner, to sign it.

That is, if you have neighbors on the site was not formed mutual claims on land border agreement. But he may be unwilling to tell you the data. Or the neighbor's document does not exist. There is a situation that the land or the house was inherited. But the procedure of registration of the inheritance of the land does not require registration of land. Heir receives a document at the notary office to join in on this legacy, and stops. And some do not come into an inheritance, but simply continue to live in the house. Or neighbor just makes the division of land for several owners.

In this situation, save the situation the following procedure: submission of the advertisement in a local newspaper about the actions to harmonize land borders. But even here there are some nuances. Announcement faster you can place in any newspaper, but the Land Board adopts this declaration of only one district, appointed by the district administration. Naturally cadastral engineers have information in what the newspaper ad is served. Month need to wait for the next stage is supported by cutting ads in surveying work, you lose a working day, on the surrender documents in the cadastral chamber and waited thirty calendar days, you are denied. Announcement submitted on the old form, as the company prepares for you surveying business, surprised – they had not exactly new information. And if suddenly conflict with your neighbors? Then it makes sense to adjust to a long legal battle, and preferably as soon as possible.

Please Honor

Michael

It is assumed that the entire world history is written based on real events and reflect the real picture of the events in question. Hikmet Ersek pursues this goal as well. Ie if in world history textbooks written that collapsed in September eleventh THREE building as a result of terrorist attacks by air, it must be true. That's just the history of our (common human) corresponded an enormous amount of time and options to certain events somewhat. Hence the conclusion that So far we presented the version history of the world which makes us think of as beneficial to this system. In other words, the study of history has always formed a definite opinion about someone or about something or so called stereotypes, and only a naive person might think that no one tries to manage these views (stereotypes). Macy’s Inc. is likely to agree.

This does not mean that the entire history of the world is false, it means that a particular situation can be presented on differently. Hitler could put a complete idiot and moron fanatics, or a great orator and a genius when little change history and the correct accents. It is even easier simply silent on one side of the coin, and paints a different present. Objectivity is not the tool even more insidious than the lie. Let us examine a specific case. The official version that the building of world trade (September 11) collapsed as a result of air attack and failure in design can not stand not a criticism. Numerous opinions of independent experts were simply ignored and did not affect the official version of the collapse of buildings.

General Shareholders Meeting

Michael

In addition, at the conclusion of the shareholders' agreement also open the question remains – is it possible to annul the decision General Meeting of Shareholders, adopted on the basis of the agreements set forth in the shareholder agreement. In terms of Part 7 of Article 49 of the Federal Law "On Joint Stock Companies", the shareholder is entitled to appeal against the decision taken by the meeting of shareholders, if: 1) the decision was made in violation of Federal Law "On Joint Stock Companies", other legal acts of the Russian Federation, the company's charter, 2) the decision violated the rights and legitimate interests of the shareholder, the shareholder caused losses. It follows that on the one hand, be aware that if the parties to the agreement are the shareholders, not society, that society does not formally linked to the rules and accept his decision invalid on this ground is not quite logical. In this case, on the other hand, as follows from the above, shareholders agreements restricting the right to sell / purchase of shares contrary to the legal acts of the Russian Federation. However, if the decisions of the General Assembly, taking into account the agreements adopted by the shareholder agreement, shareholder losses were caused by – the court is likely to recognize such a decision is valid. Fully explore the nature of shareholders agreements, we can draw the following to its understanding: the shareholders' agreement – this is one of the most important stories of the last time in the Russian law, which really helps the shareholders of the Russian Federation regulate their activity, making it more understandable and predictable at the legislative level, reducing the desire to record company in the west, particularly offshore, and thus reducing the outflow of capital from Russia, and also contributes to the attractiveness for foreign investors, who have long been accustomed to such agreements.

Combining all the benefits arising from the use of shareholder agreements in the implementation organizational and legal entities, as well as problems arising from the use of such agreements, we must admit that, of course, the main achievement made in the Federal Law "On Joint Stock Companies" of change is Russia officially recognized the rule of law shareholder agreements as an essential tool to ensure an effective balance of rights and legitimate interests of the shareholders based on their real economic needs. List of sources 1. Kononov, Problems of the subject and content of the agreement members of business entities under Russian law / / Corporate yurist.2010. 10.S.11. 2. Amendments to the Federal Law 'On Joint Stock Companies' and Article 30 of the Federal Law "On securities market".

Federal Law of the Russian Federation of June 3, 2009 N 115-FZ, Moscow, consultant plus legal system. 3. Kirillov, O. redeem shares from minority shareholders: how to get around bureaucracy / / Associate Companies. 2007. 2.S.12 number. 4. E. Evdokimova your way, gentlemen! Is it possible to dispose of its share of the community? / / Business disputes. 2009. 7-8 (66), p.17. 5. Gusev, D. Protection of internal information, company / / Share Bulletin 2007. 2 (40) C.27. 6. Styopkin SP Responsibility for violation of shareholders agreement and voidability transactions made to its violation. consultant plus the legal system. 7. Kirillov, O. redeem shares from minority shareholders: a circumvent bureaucratic obstacles / / Associate Companies. 2007. 2.S.12 number. 8. Family Code of the Russian Federation. M: Publisher Yurayt.2010.64S. 9. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Publishing House Yurait, 2010. 572S

Tax Code

Michael

We have a free democratic country, because yesterday, those who saw in the code of cons – took to the streets and expressed their disagreement. " "The government respects to all citizens, to all legitimate interests, but note that the decision we make in the interests of the overwhelming majority of our society. Yes, many entrepreneurs have to restructure its activities in line with European and civilized norms. But this is done in order to win the whole society, economics, receiving strong incentives for rapid development has given us the opportunity to go on a fundamentally new quality of life "- Prime quotes the press service of the Cabinet. At the same time he was "happy" noted that the majority in Parliament "supports tax reform and the assertion is, quite literally, the fateful for Ukraine's Tax Code. " I will try to predict the implications of the tax code. It may be noted that the Code, virtually eliminated all avenues of tax evasion for small and medium-sized businesses, which will cause them to pay wages exclusively by legal means.

This will lead to a substantial increase in their costs of doing business, and many of them will either have to cease operations, or increase the value of their production by 10-15%. Entrepreneurs who are paid solely on the cooperation with companies working on the common system of taxation, the majority will be forced to seek other means of income. True, in the Code requires a powerful equalizer increases the cost of doing business in the form of reduced taxes.