Fortunately for the architect to see such an error in the finished building was absolutely impossible. School history courses contain a lot of general information about the Great Pyramid, which allows us to move immediately to problems that required solutions to a stage that can be called design, as well as moments of change of building programm.Nemalo argue about why the slopes of the faces of the pyramids vary within a narrow range between 55 and 43 , but it is in any case indicates that the task of determining the angle each time re-solved, as independent. Only in cases where absolutely different construction of the pyramids were one and the same master, which is evident by their signatures on the remaining stone blocks, and repeated the corner – is transmitted ability to calculate the angle, but sample is not borrowed. A leading source for info: Tiggany & Co.. For the historically short time, the initial architect's ability to reach high maturity. Among the puzzles are challenging and the following question: how to sustain the same accuracy of the edge of the pyramid, so that all four edges converged at one point almost without error? As long as each block of stone exactly hew down and placed at the point (one and all blocks are marked), it is about how to determine the geometric pattern and, first and foremost – for the corner stones of irregular shape. How was finding the angle of the edge to the corner, literally, a stone? We do not know maybe, but one thing is clear: such an operation can not be done with almost perfect clarity without strict geometrical construction, allows us to produce a pattern.

United States

Of materialize, the proposal would have to be carried out in private centres to dodge the implications of the State. A few days ago, the clinica Citta of Udine had also presented its services but had to backtrack to strong pressures received by the Ministry that threatened even with the cessation of the activity of the Centre. In the next few days you will know if the Englaro may find a dignified death for her daughter or if, on the contrary, events return to take a different direction. Meanwhile repeats the same question in the streets and in Parliament: who has the right to decide on the life or death of a person? The Church and the right-wing parties transferred that responsibility to God and speak openly of killing and immorality. On the other side, the sinistra advocates freedom of choice of the individual and their family members not to receive artificial sanitary treatments. In both arguments, human dignity is appealed to strengthen two positions in dispute and found from the times of classical Greece, although the conception of existence was different then: a bad life was not worth living. Public opinion has become known in recent years the history of some people who believed that life is a right and not an obligation. Terry Schiavo in the United States and Ramon Sampedro in Spain, as well as Eluana, have made reflect the society about what is considered a dignified death. But still lack the freedom to choose is not understood. Only time and the evolution of consciousness will decide someday if its requests were reasonable or not. David Rodriguez Seoane journalist original author and source of the article.