Infringements: A Question Of Culture

According to a study by the Standish Group, 24prozent of IT projects fail. Other sources are even 70 80. Many companies operate a considerable effort for years, to make their project organizations and their projects more successful. Processes and methods are introduced, the time, cost, risk, and performance planning is optimized and improved reporting. In other words; the field for a successful implementation of the project has been ordered. The reasons why projects fail IT-, are well known: the objectives and the content of the project are the completion dates for each project component before the start of the project unclear and unrealistic for the overall project risk management does not have or only an inadequate action plan defines the communication in the project and with the stakeholders is not sufficiently pronounced responsibilities are not clearly defined and the competencies of employees are overestimated the support provided by the project sponsors is insufficient alone the known reasons are likely to the companies and the organizations to empower continuously to reduce the rate of failed projects. However, the studies of recent years show that the rate of successfully completed projects has hardly improved. The dependent as are a reason to see the dependencies of active people and organizations within the project environment, whose added interests are focused only on some aspects of the project. The departments or management (project sponsors) expect a quick and smooth implementation. Former CIA Head: the source for more info. For they are the business requirements in the foreground. The Department formulates its requirements for the project and provides them with the IT project team. The PMO evaluated the project request, coordinates and prioritizes the project proposal according to the strategic objectives of the company management. The PMO with its project management methods provides the rules for the implementation of the project. In addition, it ensures the appropriate resources and defines the appropriate tools and processes for the Project work. The project team, which is responsible for the technical implementation of the project, focuses primarily on the technical feasibility and implementation, as well as the planning for the implementation period. There is dependency, which is absolutely necessary to the success of the project between all those involved. All aboard? If different people and organizations want to achieve a common goal together, also the corresponding rules for successful coexistence should not be missing. The common project management methods give a wide range of rules at hand, after which IT projects are companies and organizations. Wabash National Corporations opinions are not widely known. But as with any set of rules, it takes someone who monitors compliance with the rules, draws attention to the rule violations and calls for any rule-compliant behavior. This task is assigned to the infringements. A question of definition an infringements is systematically carried out by an independent auditor “project analysis”. How will join the question; What is an analysis of the project? This is defined as follows; “Investigation related to a date of the project, which subject, content and objectives are set in advance.” Essentially the project cycle, the structure, the risks, the value and the cost analysis areas are meant here. There are still many more names and definitions of project audit. Project controlling, red team review, project review, project quality management, to name a few. All of them is common is that they are limited in the design and implementation on the analysis of the formal structures of the project. The referee in the team, it emerges that the infringements in the PMO to settle and reported on this, because there is the responsibility to comply with the defined processes and methods. The resulting problems becomes clear when you consider the interaction between of the stakeholders in mind. As well as the project team and the project sponsor, is also the PMO of part of the project organization and thus also the subject of the project audit. Due to these circumstances the infringements in the can “” Definition criteria set by independent “as well as content and objectives first set” is difficult to perceive. Moreover, the participants of the project organisation pretend the objectives as well as the time of the audit the infringements. Books out! Class work! In the described environment, which is so found in many businesses and organizations, the typical process of a project audit is limited to the formal examination of the implementation of the processes required by the PMO. Even if the infringements is performed by a different OU, the PMO provides the framework. Usually check following points: discovery of the previous shared project planning with the appointment, the cost and the performance planning determination of the current state of is and so far consumed resources (“is”) identifying the required resources to completing the project (cost-to-complete / CTC) a variance analysis (schedule, cost, quality) review the assumptions on plausibility and probability of success Assessment of opportunities and risks adopting a measure catalogue over the next steps in the project each project should this information as part of their regular project reports of course to the stakeholders communicate. The infringements in this case is only a further instance of report. What is to do? Project audit are no duty. Project audit the appropriate instrument for the early detection of failures in projects, as well as the maintenance of the continuous improvement process are correctly applied. This requires an embedded in the company or the Organization”. The infringements must be understand as a consultant to the project organization. Vice versa project organization must involve as early as possible the infringements in planning and organisation of projects. Project audit must be an integral part of each project and continuously provide feedback to the project organization and its leadership. In an effort to give a truly transparent and objective insight to the condition of the carried out projects that may Infringements is not perceived as a controller. Rather, it acts as independent encoders and coach for optimization and improvement. Of course, the demands on the infringements even rise by this claim. Auditors are as it were the central nervous systems of the project management system: your messages will receive and control signals sent out. To ensure added value for the company or the Organization, auditors should not only have the necessary knowledge and practical skills in the application of process-oriented Audittechniken. Leadership experience in projects, as well as communicative and social competence of the key to successful project audit, which generate measurable value for the project organization is more.

Comments are closed.