Of materialize, the proposal would have to be carried out in private centres to dodge the implications of the State. A few days ago, the clinica Citta of Udine had also presented its services but had to backtrack to strong pressures received by the Ministry that threatened even with the cessation of the activity of the Centre. In the next few days you will know if the Englaro may find a dignified death for her daughter or if, on the contrary, events return to take a different direction. Meanwhile repeats the same question in the streets and in Parliament: who has the right to decide on the life or death of a person? The Church and the right-wing parties transferred that responsibility to God and speak openly of killing and immorality. On the other side, the sinistra advocates freedom of choice of the individual and their family members not to receive artificial sanitary treatments. In both arguments, human dignity is appealed to strengthen two positions in dispute and found from the times of classical Greece, although the conception of existence was different then: a bad life was not worth living. Public opinion has become known in recent years the history of some people who believed that life is a right and not an obligation. Terry Schiavo in the United States and Ramon Sampedro in Spain, as well as Eluana, have made reflect the society about what is considered a dignified death. But still lack the freedom to choose is not understood. Only time and the evolution of consciousness will decide someday if its requests were reasonable or not. David Rodriguez Seoane journalist original author and source of the article.
all compounded by the fact that segment of the market shows rapid growth – the company sverhuspeshna that allows business to turn a blind eye to the excessive costs of the IT department. Probably just need to mark divisions and IT departments complete nesplochennost team. And we all know that team spirit is very important success of the project. Chaos in its purest form! Part of the team decides that you can not live like this and decides to restore order. The first and the last thing done – created samopisnaya change management system.
The system itself is a classic cottage system – the only record of requests and only one type. Control of it is really possible only problems, not small puzzles with one responsible, and global zadachinami, broken in stages, each stage is fixed a bunch of subcontractors and is responsible, then there are lots of owners on a mission. Any postponement of any stage led to a manual rework all the responsibility, the proper steps. Separate the stages. Stages are built in a waterfall, which provides not only a return to the previous one, but at any higher – as deems proper head stage.
It is clear that he does not always shrewdly guessed where it was back (especially when it is not established clear criteria for return). No need to say that after this “iteration” does not suspecting the owner of another phase of extremely surprised that the agreed objectives through three head went back. This approach can be considered valid only if the company is working on dynamically changing the market – only if the work can be reviewed and returned to the beginning – for analysis. In any other case, it is clear that the organization is no analysis and requirements management.